Tuesday, May 5, 2020
Neuroscientific Debate Question Samples â⬠MyAssignmenthelp.com
Question: Discuss about the Neuroscientific Debate Question. Answer: Debate Question Magnet as tools to alter brain functions. Null Hypothesis: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) through repeated magnetic field stimulus accounts for activating the neuronal circuitry in specific regions of the brain. This occurs mostly in the superficial structures of the cerebral cortex in an effort to regulate the mood of an individual thereby ameliorating the depressive symptoms. The electromagnetic induction of the insulated coil that may be placed on top of the scalp is utilized in the process to stimulate the specific cortical regions of the brain through generation of pulses in rapid succession thereby allowing for long term changes in the brain functioning. Alternative Hypothesis: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation does not significantly alter the cognitive functioning in the brain. The reason may be due to confinement of the administered stimulus to only a small region of the cortex lacking the penetration capacity to the other subcortical regions that plays vital roles in affecting the cognitive aspect of the higher order functions. Therefore no prominent positive effect in mitigating depression may be observed. Annotated Bibliography The efficacy of TMS as an alternative treatment modality to pharmacotherapy in case of postpartum depression (PPD) affected women have been tested in the interventional study where 19 patients received treatment ranging from 4 weeks to 8 weeks of daily dosage of left prefrontal TMS. Assessment of EPDS total score as change in depression marker was conducted as measurement of primary outcome while the remission was closely observed as a valuable secondary outcome parameter. Findings suggest that both the objectives were satisfactorily fulfilled by application of TMS and therefore may be suggested as a suitable monotherapy to treat women suffering from major depressive disorder with post partum onset.1 In this exploratory research, 68 patients having major depressive disorder were subjected to sham or real TMS intervention at the estimated prefrontal cortex threshold to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Coupled to this, neuropsychological functioning was assessed as well both in pre and post TMS condition. Results of the study revealed that no negative neuropsychological effect occurred on TMS treatment although no evidence in support of improved neuropsychological function was noted either. Positive effects of TMS on neuropsychological functioning if any along with betterment of cognitive functioning as independent impacts of TMS need to be further assessed.2 Reflection The stimulation of the brain in order to get the desired results and its possible application as part of therapeutic intervention in case of certain neurocognitive disorders is quite common in modern times. TMS utilization in case of persons suffering with depression through activation of the regions that show decreased activity seem to harbor beneficial effects through alleviation of the depressive symptoms by means of delivering repetitive magnetic pulses in quick succession. This fascinating fact pertaining to TMS intrigued me to chose this topic and delve deeper to find out more regarding the positive and downsides of TMS. Reviewing the discussion of the first article I feel that the utility of TMS application is far greater than its potential limitations as it may be efficiently utilized in case of the post partum depression affected women who reported of better outcomes following this novel intervention. Moreover, I believe that since no adverse reactions were observed in the studied population the reliability and validity of the use of TMS in such instances are increased manifold. The content of the second article helped me to probe further regarding the potential uses of TMS and I got to understand that in the treatment of major depression, the TMS do not exhibit significant alterations in the neuropsychological functioning thereby suggesting that improvements with respect to the neuropsychological performance and cognitive functioning are independent effects of TMS. References Brock, D. G., Demitrack, M. A., Groom, P., Holbert, R., Rado, J. T., Gross, P. K., Weeks, H. R. Effectiveness of NeuroStar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with major depressive disorder with postpartum onset. Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation, 9(5), e7. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.023 (2016). Wajdik, C., Claypoole, K. H., Fawaz, W., Holtzheimer III, P. E., Neumaier, J., Dunner, D. L., Avery, D. H. No Change in Neuropsychological Functioning After Receiving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Treatment for Major Depression. J ECT, 30(4), 320. doi: 1097/YCT.0000000000000096 (2014). Brock, D. G., Demitrack, M. A., Groom, P., Holbert, R., Rado, J. T., Gross, P. K., Weeks, H. R. Effectiveness of NeuroStar transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with major depressive disorder with postpartum onset. Brain Stimulation: Basic, Translational, and Clinical Research in Neuromodulation, 9(5), e7. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.023 (2016). Wajdik, C., Claypoole, K. H., Fawaz, W., Holtzheimer III, P. E., Neumaier, J., Dunner, D. L., Avery, D. H. No Change in Neuropsychological Functioning After Receiving Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Treatment for Major Depression. J ECT, 30(4), 320. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000096 (2014).
Sunday, April 19, 2020
The 1st Stasimon in Sophocles play Oedipus the King is mainly showing the Chorus Essay Example For Students
The 1st Stasimon in Sophocles play Oedipus the King is mainly showing the Chorus Essay The 1st Stasimon in Sophocles play Oedipus the King is mainly showing the Chorus confusion in regards to Tiresias accusations made towards Oedipus. The Chorus seem terrified and powerless, and, like Oedipus, do not want to believe the accusations. They feel that the gods know the truth, yet will not reveal it, thus feeling as though the gods are of no real help. There are many issues and techniques to be discussed in regards to the 1st Stasimon, one of these being the significance of the section. The real significance of the 1st Stasimon is that it shows the reader how much of a respected role model Oedipus is to the community of Thebes; they will not accuse him until true proof has been revealed about the incident. This can be shown from the third quote in the 1st Stasimon handout. It reads: No, not till I see these charges proved will I side with his accusers. This shows that the Chorus considers Oedipus to be a true leader, and hence will follow him regardless. We will write a custom essay on The 1st Stasimon in Sophocles play Oedipus the King is mainly showing the Chorus specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now Another factor of significance in the first stasimon is that it shows the audience how the Chorus believes that Oedipus was brought to Thebes for a reason; this being to bring joy back into the city. The fourth quote in the handout is a good example of this: We saw him thenà ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦with our own eyes his skill, his brilliant triumph à ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã¢â¬Å" there was the test à ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã¢â¬Å" he was the joy of Thebes! Through this quote we can see admiration shown towards Oedipus due to his defeat against the Sphinx, and ridding the city from the curse. This brought joy back into the city, and turned Oedipus into a hero. Another issue raised in the 1st Stasimon was gender representation. Gender representation played a minor role in the First Stasimon. In this section, all well respected people or gods were men; the only woman mentioned in the text was the Sphinx, whom was rather referred to as the she-hawk. This can be seen in quote 7 in the 1st Stasimon handout. Hawks are considered to be evil birds, and are often in some texts considered to be possessed by the Devil, which shows that the Sphinx was not respected whatsoever, and was considered evil. Also, when the Chorus was trying to solve the question of who killed Laius, they basically ruled out the thought that the killer could be a woman. This can be seen in quote 6, which reads: Who is the man the voice of god denounces? This shows that nobody believes that a woman could ever have killed Laius, perhaps because physical strength would have been needed, and women were not expected to carry any physical strength. Had the chorus had thought that a woman may have killed Laius, they probably would have asked who is the person the voice of god denounces? The issue of Inequality of Power was also raised in the 1st Stasimon. The great gods were considered to have the highest level of power, Oedipus being next, and the prophets and seers being the lowest of powers along with the Chorus. This can be seen in quote 8 on the 1st Stasimon handout, when the Chorus was trying to prove that Tiresias could not know the real truth. Quote 8 reads: Zeus and Apollo know, they know, the great masters of all the dark and depth of human life. But whether a mere man can know the truth, whether a seer can fathom more than I This shows that the Chorus feels as though seers have the same power as the chorus, and therefore would know no better. However, they also see the gods to be of high power, and so would believe anything they say. The chorus sees Oedipus to be of higher power than them, as they call him their king. This can be seen through quote 9 on the handout, which reads Never will I convict my king, never in my heart. Another issue to be discussed in the 1st Stasimon is Accusation, Distrust and Denial. The whole Stasimon is based around the one main accusation; this being the accusation made towards Oedipus by Tiresias. The chorus is unsure of whether to believe the accusation, or to follow their king, which brings the issue of distrust into the text. The Chorus are unsure as to whether they can trust what the prophet has said to them, as they cannot see how a murder could be brought between Laius and the son of Polybus as they know Oedipus to be. This can be seen through a number of quotes within the 1st Stasimon, two of these being quotes 10 and 11 on the handout given. Quote 10 reads: The skilled prophet scans the birds and shatters me with terror! I cant accept him, cant deny him, dont know what to say. This explains how the prophet has searched for the murderer of Laius, and has found the person to be Oedipus, which shatters the Chorus with terror. The Chorus do not want to accept the prophets findings, yet cannot ignore them, and so are unsure of whether Oedipus did in fact murder Laius. Quote 11 reads: and what could breed a blood feud between Laius house and the son of Polybus? This shows that the Chorus cannot see what conflict between Laius and Polybus could have ever brought upon a murder such as this, and so are once again unsure as to whether they should believe the prophets words. .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 , .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .postImageUrl , .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 , .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092:hover , .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092:visited , .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092:active { border:0!important; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092:active , .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092 .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u7b810b7c32778756c9e94c3116439092:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Great Expectations By Charles Dickens Essay ThesisThe issue of Denial is brought into the first stasimon when the Chorus comes to the conclusion that they should follow their king, as they see him as a well-respected role model. Hence they wish to deny the accusations, and try to ignore the bad that has been brought upon their king. This can be shown from quote #13 on the handout, which reads: Never will I convict my king, never in my heart. This basically shows that they will never turn upon Oedipus, and hence will deny all accusations turned to him. The role of beliefs is a very important issue in the 1st Stasimon. During the whole text of Oedipus the King, prophecies have always been trusted and acted upon, and never questioned. However, as the 1st Stasimon reads on, the Chorus starts to believe that what Tiresias accusation states may not be true. The Chorus hears of the prophecy about Oedipus, yet still says that they will never convict their king, which basically shows that they are turning away from the prophecy, and are instead suggesting that the role of power in Greek society is more important than prophecies. Because Oedipus is of high power, he is respected, and the prophecies made against him are ignored. Although the prophecies are not trusted, the great gods still remain important and well trusted. The Chorus believes that the gods know the truth as to who killed Laius, yet will not reveal it. Hence the gods are not thought of as helpful to the city as they were previously considered, yet are still considered to know the truth. This can be seen through quote 15 on the handout, which reads: Zeus and Apollo know, they know, the great masters of all the dark and depth of human life. This shows that the Chorus sees the gods as to know the dark and depth of all human life, yet still keep the truth hidden. Another issue discussed in the text is Elements of a Greek Tragedy. Three elements of a Greek Tragedy discussed in the 1st Stasimon are hamartia, peripeteia, and nemesis. The issue of hamartia was brought into the text, as the accusation made towards the protagonist brought a downfall of character. Oedipus was accused of killing his father, which in turn affected his loyalty and trust according to some characters. The Chorus can see the downfall of character, as described in quote 17 on the handout, which reads: The dark wings beating around him shrieking doom, the doom that never dies, the terrorà ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦ This shows that the Chorus can see evil catching up on Oedipus, and bringing doom to him, which will never end. Peripeteia is mentioned, as the Chorus can see Oedipus future changing. Oedipus has not yet been exiled from Thebes, yet the Chorus can see his luck and fame changing. This can be seen in quote 18 on the handout, which reads: to attack his fame that rings around Thebes. This shows that the Chorus can see something changing what the community thinks about Oedipus; the accusation will attack his fame that rings around Oedipus. Like the issue of peripeteia in the 1st Stasimon, the issue of nemesis has not yet been brought up, but the Chorus can see the gods falling down on Oedipus, and can see them changing his luck to bad. This can be seen through quote 19 on the handout, which reads: Apollo son of the Father lunges on him, lightning-bolts afire! The Chorus can see the anger within the gods, as they hunt down on the killer of Laius, whom is Oedipus. Another point of discussion within the 1st Stasimon is the attitudes portrayed by the Chorus towards Oedipus. The Chorus gives a very loving affect/attitude towards Oedipus. They seem as though to feel sympathetic towards him, and in their hearts hope that the accusations made towards Oedipus are not true. They also show a very loyal attitude to their king, as they say that they will never side with him until real proof has been shown about the incident. The Chorus also shows admiration towards Oedipus, when describing his defeat against the Sphinx, and saved the city of Thebes from its curse. Quotes 20, 21 and 22 on the handout relate to the attitude portrayed by the Chorus, in regards to Oedipus. Quote 20 reads: Never will I convict my king, never in my heart. This shows the loyal and loving affect given to Oedipus, as the Chorus do not want to leave his side, even though he is accused of murder. Quote 21 reads: No, not till I see these charges proved will I side with his accusers. This also shows loyalty and respect to Oedipus, as they are saying that they will not leave him until true proof has been revealed. Quote 22 reads: we saw him then, when the she-hawk swept against himà ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦his skill, his brilliant triumphà ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦he was the joy of Thebes! This shows the admiration shown towards Oedipus, as they admired his skill and triumph, and they basically said that he was the person who brought joy back into Thebes. Symbolism, metaphors and similes play a rather crucial role in the structure of the 1st Stasimon. The words chosen in the text help describe the occurrences, which give a deeper impact on the audience. .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 , .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .postImageUrl , .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 , .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53:hover , .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53:visited , .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53:active { border:0!important; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53:active , .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53 .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .ud5f62f92b72252afc0cbbd2fb36cec53:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Pointless characters to play EssayThe Chorus speech within the 1st Stasimon is full of images of caves, darkness, lightning, and wings. By reading these terms used, the audience is given an image of darkness, the unknown, and most significantly, terror of the gods. These terms were used as to show the bad occurrences that were to come of the killer of Laius, the anger of the gods to the murderer, and also gives a more mystified approached as to who actually killed Laius. An image of darkness can be shown in quote number 23, which reads: the dark wings beating around him shrieking doom, the doom that never dies, the terror. By reading the words dark, shrieking, doom, and terror, we are automatically given a bad feeling towards the quote, and we could sense that bad was going to come. Also, in quote 24, which reads: Apollo son of the father lunges on him, lightning-bolts afire! And the grim unerring Furies closing for the kill. , the words lunge, lightning-bolts, grim, and furies, give yet another deep impact on the audience, and we an automatically sense the anger within the gods, and can see the desperation to catch the killer of Laius. In quote 25, which reads: Now under bristling timber up through rocks and caves he stalks like the wild mountain bull, the words rocks, caves, stalks, wild and bull are used, which once again gives a negative impact on the audience. From these words the reader senses darkness and mystery, which gives a deep impact and further enhances the text. Metaphors and similes were used effectively when describing a variety of issues brought up in the text. A good example of this is quote 26 on the handout, which reads: when the she-hawk swept against him. By using the word she-hawk to describe the Sphinx, a bad image is instantly cast on the Sphinx, and the audience is led to think that she is evil. A good use of similes is also used when describing the killer hiding in mystery, in quote 27, which reads: Like a wild mountain bull. By the using the word wild we think of the killer being set as an outcast leaving society as to hide from the gods. Another technique to discuss in the 1st Stasimon, is diction. The diction used in the 1st Stasimon is very important. Its powerful tone and emotion emphasised the Chorus speech, enabling the Chorus to give a large impact on the audience. By using words such as darkness, doom and terror, the Chorus is able to give a dark and mysterious atmosphere to the play, whereas by using the words skill, brilliant, triumph, and joy, the Chorus sent a light and positive atmosphere to the audience. An example of powerful tone and emotion is quote 29 on the 1st Stasimon handout, which reads: beating around him shrieking doom, the doom that never dies, the terror. By using the words doom and terror there is a deep and dark impact on the audience, creating a very powerful atmosphere. The last technique to discuss relating to the first stasimon is structure and syntax. The structure of the 1st Stasimon has very little difference as to the rest of the play. Some minor differences in the first stasimon is the fact that there are no stage directions etc, but this is because there is only one part in the text; no characters move during the text. There are some minor roles of sentence structure within the first stasimon, these being the use of à ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦, exclamation marks, and the use of short paragraphs. à ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦s were used as they gave a sense of uncertainty in the text, and also shows that what the speaker is saying is not yet finished, however perhaps he/she does not know anything else to say. An example of this is quote 30 on the handout, which reads: I cannot see whats to come, whats still to comeà ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦ By using the à ¢Ã¢â ¬Ã ¦ at the end of the speech, you can sense uncertainty in the chorus, as they are unsure as to what may happen next to Oedipus, they are uncertain about his future. Exclamation marks are used to create depth in the text, and to show excitement in the speakers voice. An example of this is quote 31 on the handout, which reads: he was the joy of Thebes! Through the use of the exclamation mark, you can see that the chorus is happy with what he had just spoken, as there is excitement in his words. Short paragraphs were used once again create depth. Through the use of short paragraphs, the facts are given and are to the point, which shows exactly what is needed to be said, without elaborating too much. An example of a short paragraph is quote 32 in the handout, which reads: Cased in armour, Apollo son of the Father lunges on him, lightning-bolts afire! and the grim unerring Furies closing for the kill. As you can see, this is a very short paragraph, however simply states the anger of the gods, and shows that they are searching for the killer of Laius. The main points are spoken and are to the point, without it being too overelaborated.
Tuesday, April 14, 2020
An Act With Essay Sample - How to Write Better Essays
An Act With Essay Sample - How to Write Better EssaysBefore you begin to compose an essay, you need to understand the act with essay sample. The act with essay sample is a method that helps you make your essay look more natural and casual. You will learn the basic steps of this method in this article. You will also learn how to correct all the common mistakes that you may make while writing your essay.Always start your essay by explaining to the reader what you are trying to get across to them. You do not want to try to cram all your information into the first paragraph of your essay. Readers are not smart people who can just read any text and immediately know what you are trying to say. Make sure that you always give your readers enough time to absorb all the important details. Some essays may also be better without the first paragraph.However, you should not try to just jump straight into the last paragraph. Make sure that you carefully outline your essay first. Start from the begi nning and finish with the end of the final paragraph. This will help you plan out all the details before you start writing.You can use various tools such as jotting down notes as you write. Do not just go with the flow. Instead, write down what you can think of each time. It will help you write better.For example, if you are writing a research paper, you will need to write a different type of essay. Try to avoid using the same examples from other types of documents. Instead, choose those that speak more of yourself. By knowing your own style, you will be able to create a new perspective for your readers.Keep in mind that when you are writing an essay, you are just trying to answer specific questions. You do not need to come up with a big argument just because you want to. Instead, write in a simple way so that you can easily answer the questions asked.You do not need to use tons of research papers as you are writing your essay. Use only facts and definitions to support your points. Do not forget to include your opinion on each point you make. The act with essay sample will help you include every sentence you want.You can even get the writer's workshop books to help you when writing your essay. If you have a teacher, ask them to be with you during the writing process. They can also tell you about all the tips that they have learned over the years.
Sunday, March 15, 2020
Battle of Magdhaba in World War I
Battle of Magdhaba in World War I Conflict The Battle of Magdhaba was part of the Sinai-Palestine Campaign of World War I (1914-1918). Date British troops were victorious at Magdhaba on December 23, 1916. Armies Commanders British Commonwealth General Sir Henry Chauvel3 mounted brigades, 1 camel brigade Ottomans Khadir Bey1,400 men Background Following the victory at the Battle of Romani, British Commonwealth forces, led by General Sir Archibald Murray and his subordinate, Lt. General Sir Charles Dobell, began pushing across the Sinai Peninsula towards Palestine. To support operations in the Sinai, Dobell ordered the construction of a military railway and water pipeline across the peninsulas desert. Leading the British advance was the Desert Column commanded by General Sir Philip Chetwode. Consisting of all of Dobells mounted troops, Chetwodes force pressed east and captured the coastal town of El Arish on December 21. Entering El Arish, the Desert Column found the town empty as Turkish forces had retreated east along the coast to Rafa and south long the Wadi El Arish to Magdhaba. Relieved the next day by the 52nd Division, Chetwode ordered General Henry Chauvel to take the ANZAC Mounted Division and the Camel Corps south to clear out Magdhaba. Moving south, the attack required a quick victory as Chauvels men would be operating over 23 miles from the closest source of water. On the 22nd, as Chauvel was receiving his orders, the commander of the Turkish Desert Force, General Freiherr Kress von Kressenstein visited Magdhaba. Ottoman Preparations Though Magdhaba was now in advance of the main Turkish lines, Kressenstein felt required to defend it as the garrison, the 2nd and 3rd battalions of the 80th Regiment, consisted of locally recruited Arabs. Numbering over 1,400 men and commanded by Khadir Bey, the garrison was supported by four old mountain guns and a small camel squadron. Assessing the situation, Kressenstein departed that evening satisfied with the towns defenses. Marching overnight, Chauvels column reached the outskirts of Magdhaba near dawn on December 23rd. Chauvels Plan Scouting around Magdhaba, Chauvel found that the defenders had constructed five redoubts to protect the town. Deploying his troops, Chauvel planned to attack from the north and east with the 3rd Australian Light Horse Brigade, the New Zealand Mounted Rifles Brigade, and the Imperial Camel Corps. To prevent the Turks from escaping, the 10th Regiment of the 3rd Light Horse was sent southeast of the town. The 1st Australian Light Horse was placed in reserve along the Wadi El Arish. Around 6:30 AM, the town was attacked by 11 Australian aircraft. Chauvel Strikes Though ineffective, the aerial attack served to draw Turkish fire, alerting the attackers to the location of trenches and strong points. Having received reports that the garrison was retreating, Chauvel ordered the 1st Light Horse to make a mounted advance towards the town. As they approached, they came under artillery and machine gun fire from Redoubt No. 2. Breaking into a gallop, the 1st Light Horse turned and sought refuge in the wadi. Seeing that the town was still being defended, Chauvel ordered the full attack forward. This soon stalled with his men pinned down on all fronts by heavy enemy fire. Lacking heavy artillery support to break the deadlock and concerned about his water supply, Chauvel contemplated breaking off the attack and went so far as to request permission from Chetwode. This was granted and at 2:50 PM, he issued orders for the retreat to begin at 3:00 PM. Receiving this order, Brigadier General Charles Cox, commander of the 1st Light Horse, decided to ignore it as an attack against Redoubt No. 2 was developing on his front. Able to approach through the wadi to within 100 yards of the redoubt, elements of his 3rd Regiment and the Camel Corps were able to mount a successful bayonet attack. Having gained a footing in the Turkish defenses, Coxs men swung around and captured Redoubt No. 1 and Khadir Beys headquarters. With the tide turned, Chauvels retreat orders were cancelled and the full attack resumed, with Redoubt No. 5 falling to a mounted charge and Redoubt No. 3 surrendering to the New Zealanders of the 3rd Light Horse. To the southeast, elements of the 3rd Light Horse captured 300 Turks as they attempted to flee the town. By 4:30 PM, the town was secured and the majority of the garrison taken prisoner. Aftermath The Battle of Magdhaba resulted in 97 killed and 300 wounded for the Turks as well as 1,282 captured. For Chauvels ANZACs and the Camel Corps casualties were only 22 killed and 121 wounded. With the capture of Magdhaba, British Commonwealth forces were able to continue their push across the Sinai towards Palestine. With the completion of the railway and pipeline, Murray and Dobell were able to commence operations against the Turkish lines around Gaza. Repulsed on two occasions, they were eventually replaced by General Sir Edmund Allenby in 1917.
Thursday, February 27, 2020
How is buying a house better then renting a apartment Essay
How is buying a house better then renting a apartment - Essay Example The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast the alternatives of buying or renting a home. Homeownership is part of the American dream. A home is a place where people spend the majority of their time. Being a homeowner is a status symbol of success in life. Home ownership has many virtues. When a person decides to buy a home they can select a home that has all the attributes they are looking for. A person can buy a home or apartment that is already constructed or they can purchase a piece of land and built their own home. Due to the rising construction costs most people prefer to purchase a home that is already build. In the renting marketplace a person is limited to the houses or apartments that are available for rent in their region. Typically a person that owns a home has more space available than a person that rents. Homeowners do not have to comply with strict rules due to that fact they do not have to report to anyone. Sometimes renters have problems with landlords who attempt to impose rules that affect the renterââ¬â¢s freedom. When a person owns a home they can invite people to their house and have parties without worrying about what the landlord thinks. Buying a home has several economic advantages. The interest rates of the mortgage are tax deductible on the primary home of residence. If a person purchases a second home as an investment, then the homeowner does not have the privilege of deducting interest. Due to the fact that banks utilized compound interest formulas for mortgages during the first years the amount of interest paid are very high which implies that the deduction tax privileges are also high. An advantage of becoming a homeowner in 2011 is that the housing market is currently a buyerââ¬â¢s market. In the state of Florida the median price of homes is just $123,000 (Cnn). A lot of homes are selling for less than their actual value. Under such circumstances the buyer of a home can increase their wealth in terms of equity fro m day one. A great advantage about home ownership is that it creates wealth for the owner. As time passes by the homeowner will increase his wealth in terms of equity. The equity a person accumulates on a home can be put to good use in the future. If a person ever needs a large sum of money to pay for large expenses such as the college education of their children they can use the equity of the home to get a second mortgage. Another way that homeownership can benefit a person is by using the extra space on the home to rent out to a person. Many people rent the basement, attic, or an extra room of their homes to make some extra money. Renting out space can help a homeowner cover a percentage of the mortgage payment. A person that owns a home can invest additional money to improve the home. Renters do not have that privilege because they cannot construct on something that is not theirs. Being a homeowner provides a person with an extra sense of security because there is not contract in place with a landlord. Landlords once the contract expires can kick a person out of their home for whatever reason they like. Also homeowners pay a fix mortgage payment. The renters are often faced with price hikes once the contract expires. Typically renting contracts only last a year. The one year contract norm benefits the landlord because the person can raise the price of the rent on a yearly basis. Despite all the advantages associated with home ownerships there are also disadvantages. The
Tuesday, February 11, 2020
Employer-sponsored Retirement Plans Research Paper
Employer-sponsored Retirement Plans - Research Paper Example The compensation issues will have been put to rest. As a human right policy, it means that every individualââ¬â¢s contribution to the national development is highly valued and that this valued contribution will be equitably compensated. Moreover, for workers in the same job family, there should never be a huge disparity in pay and compensation structure especially if workers are employed under the same skill qualification (Human Resources and Skills Development Canada). In the second question, analysis established that there is a violation of Equity Pay Act on policy-capturing. This is so because studies on the over three hundred job families, there was a disparity on the point-factor in the study found out that there exists disparity in jobs with similar job content features. Such features include the level and span of supervision, education level, analytic reasoning and experience. These features clusters job families into similar compensable factors that will be used in determining point-factor pay by use of relevant weight factors. Irrespective of this methodology, it was found that there is a disparity in pay and compensation in female and race-dominated classes. This creates biases that violate the Pay Equity Act as there is no structure that sets the maintenance of such envisioned internal equity. Even after employment there is no quantitative evaluation system of the job tied to a unified wage structure that will guard against subjective in equity from occurring. These include promotion and wage increment as gender and race-based prejudices sets in and prevent upward mobility of women and workers from other minority races (Chen, 98). Specifically, the law, Equity Pay Act 1963 prohibits any gender-based discrimination in a work establishment. This is so for men and women who are working on essentially similar skill and experience. Congress, in its wisdom, contemplated equity if the
Friday, January 31, 2020
The Parable of the Old Man and the Young Essay Example for Free
The Parable of the Old Man and the Young Essay The Parable of the Old Man and the Young is a short poem written by Wilfred Owen in 1920, As the title mentions, the poem is a parable. It is generally accepted that the old man, Abram, represents the European nations or more probably their governments, the first view of the poem is that it is heavily based on the story Abram (Genesis 22:1-18), where Abram is told to sacrifice his son. In the story, as he was about to sacrifice his son as an offering to God, an angel comes down and tells him to stop and to sacrifice a lamb instead. He does as hes told and makes a covenant with God saying that Abram will be the Father of a new nation. But the twist in this poem is that when Abram is told by the angel to stop, he doesnt and kills his son. But the old man would not so, but slew his son,/And half the seed of Europe, one by one. The author also manages to include metaphors and symbolisms referring to a war. Then Abram bound the youth with belts and straps, /and builded parapets and trenches there. This quote is clearly depicting an image of Isaac going unwillingly to war with the parapets and trenches. When lo! an angel called him out of heaven,/ Saying, Lay not thy hand upon the lad,/ Neither do anything to him. Behold,/ A ram, caught in a thicket by its horns;/ Offer the Ram of Pride instead of him. The quote symbolizes that all that all Abram has to do is give up his pride and not send his son Isaac to the gruesome war. But the old man would not so, but slew his son,/ And half the seed of Europe, one by one. I believe that Abram represents the government of Europe, drafting the people (Isaac) to go to their doom in war. Along with the rest of the population of Europe to die at war, heartlessly and without any regret all the government had to do was give up their pride. Probably Europe lost the war. The last two lines are the only ones that rhyme, and the image they paint is chilling: an old man methodically killing the seed of Europe. It is mainly the power of this image, set out in the poem and culminating in the last two lines, that makes it haunting. Recruiting Recruiting is a poem written by E. A. Mackintosh, who served in World War 1 until 1917 were he was killed at the Somme. Mackintoshââ¬â¢s poem is very bitter, heavily sarcastic and he aims to send a message to the people back in England who pressure young men to go to war. The first word in the poem is ââ¬Å"Ladsâ⬠suggests youth and innocence, which contrasts how Mackintosh sees the people who set up the campaign as the ââ¬Å"fat civiliansâ⬠which shows emphasises of how these people could not fight the war themselves. The second stanza the poet supports how the ââ¬Å"fat civiliansâ⬠could not fight by quoting them saying ââ¬Å"Could go and fight the Hunâ⬠Knowing they will never be in danger of doing anything of the sort as they ââ¬Å"thank God they are over fourty oneâ⬠The poet also attacks the shallow girls who are often seen as the reasons why men went off to die, to please them. The girls are said to have feathers because they would give them to men who hadnââ¬â¢t joined up as a sign of cowardice. The songs are ââ¬Å"vulgar songsâ⬠meaning they have little real emotion, they are shallow and crude. After the third stanza Mackintosh speaks of what the recruiting posters should say if they are honest: ââ¬Å"the real picture of ââ¬Å"shivering in the morning dewâ⬠and killing people ââ¬Å"like yourselves. â⬠Which is a frequent theme that the Mackintosh wants the reader to know that the German soldiers were ordinary men just like them. Mackibtosh also attacks the journalists as he belives that they like the war because the casualties give them something to talk about, this is shown in the line ââ¬Å"Help o keep them nicee and safeâ⬠which is really bitter aimed at those who would send young men to die to protect their own comfort but who would do nothing about it themselves. The last line ââ¬Å"Ladââ¬â¢s youââ¬â¢re wanted ââ¬â out you go. â⬠Ends with a dismissive phrase after the dash to show how eagerly the civilians wanted the soldiers to go.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)