Nora vs. Kate: Compare and Contrast Essay

Upon unadulterated examination of the act A maams Ho give by Henrik Ibsen and the novel My babys Keeper create verb all(prenominal)y by Jodi Picoult, it is evident that there ar certain characters within both pieces of literature that affirm the same perception of admire and loyalty only at the coating of what the reader would believe to occur, a doodad takes place, i ending in dashing hopes and the opposite ending in tragedy . I found that characters Nora from A dames House and Anna from My Sisters Keeper show true signs of cosmos loyal to the ones they go to bed by issue out of their way to please their family members in ways that comprise their existence.Although one whitethorn seem to view the ending of both literatures as tragic or fill with sadness, both Nora and Anna be e bitcipated from their situations. (Ibsen, 1965) Nora is seen as naive at the beginning of the play where she demonstrates childish qualities causing her married man, Torvald to sacrifice her the cognomen Doll. The barrier doll reveals the manner in which her witness husband views her. The symbolism of that term is belittlement and allows her husband to deny her of her accept self-importance or indistinguishability. For example, Torvald states, that is like a muliebrity you know what I think slightly that.No debt, no borrowing. (Ibsen, 21) The play reveals that Nora and Torvalds conduct creates a sense of lower status mingled with the two by her permitting him to prattle as though they are unequally yoked. It is also revealed within the play that she is exposed of fabrication, which plows a major issue end-to-end the play. It is for that regionicular reason why her spousal concludes. Apparently, Nora had been living a double feel where their money was non creation spent, although for a good reason, that is, to find out a contri howevere for which would save her husbands spirit, legitimately.Her husband comes to find out that Nora had been secr etly salaried off a debt for the loan where she hammer her fathers signature to obtain it. Before Torvald is promoted at the same monetary institution where Krogstad, the man who gave the loan to Nora reported, he threatens to expose Noras illegimate behaviour, thereby try oning to go against Torvalds reputation and ensuring that he holds his slope at the bank. Nora scour tells a booster shot that she is proud of the decision because it was done for the hit the hay of her husband.Torvald comes to authoritativeize that Nora does not exemplify the wifely qualities he intellection a wife should possess. Torvald questions their trade union when he inquires, Noracan I ever be anyaffair to a greater extent than a stranger to you? and she responds by conjectureing, both you and I would have to be so changed that. our keep together would be a real wedlock. (Ibsen, 375-280) Her actions reveal self-independence as well. Upon conclusion of the play, Nora finds her deliver i dentity and leaves her husband.Ibsen clearly suggests a mental picture of self when Nora is able to emancipate herself from her husband. This creates a theme of self-confidence and self-motivation. Noras institution to understand that she is not inferior to Torvald creates mental strength in knowing that she does not have to be dependent on him to make her feel loved as a serviceman be. Self-identity is also main(prenominal) in a good marriage because although when husband and wife marry and they become one, they can make choices to benefit each.I do not believe that Nora make the even off decision by beat her fathers signature but I do believe that Torvald should have stood by her because it was her way of showing how a great deal she loved him. (Ibsen, 1965) The character Anna from My Sisters Keeper is very similar in the fact that throughout the novel and from the clipping she was born, Anna was a creation based on the fact that her older sister Kate overwhelmed by sick ness. Anna does not have her own identity because from the time she was a child, parents Sarah and Brian Fitzgerald expected her to be an organ donor for Kate at all be.According to Brian who is a firefighter, the asylum of the delivery boy is of a higher priority than the safety of the victim. Always. (Picoult, 142) Anna realizes that in order to make her own decision it is necessary to emancipate or free herself via natural lawsuit through which her lawyer Campbell Alexander feeds for her until the case is resolved. It is later(prenominal) revealed within the novel that the lawsuit is a result of Kate encouraging Anna not to present her kidney to her. Kate also wanted to emancipate herself from pass through all the medical issues that has plagued life from a young age.The relationship between the two sisters is what seemed to be an unbreakable bring together until Anna is killed in a severe railcar accident when both Campbell and herself are capricious to the hospital. Campbell lives. With this ironic twist, as power of attorney is Campbells, he decides to give Annas kidney to Kate who lives intelligent throughout life. Anna, although she loses her identity when she is killed, emancipation arrives. She is emancipated from having to worry about her sisters health and the pressure of the parents in qualification her feel obliged to Kate.Like Noras situation, Annas family structure is compromised because of certain decisions do. They are also both freed from situations where they thought to be binding and felt as if they were being forced be a part of circumstances of compulsion and responsibility. If Nora or Anna were to ab initio deny their family members of what they needed to survive, they would be thought to be disloyal and selfish but in fact, they were both selfless individuals. The love they had for family for so great that they looked beyond their own selves to do what was logically and morally right in their eyes.(Picoult, 2005) Due to the fact that A Dolls House was pen during the 1800s which was a time effect in history when husband viewed their wives as the typical housewife which entailt they did not work outside of the house. Their main duties were to stay at home, take care of the children, clean the house, and specify meals while the husband was expected to be the breadwinner of the family. It was unusual for many wives to leave their husbands even when spoken to in a condescend manner.They often were willing to endure that broad of language and remained with their husbands at all costs because it was what was expected of them at that time in society. Society in the 1800 often was a determinant for the way in which man and wife would live and anyone who diverted from the average was viewed as insubordinate. My Sisters Keeper, compose in this 21st century is opposite because it speaks of unethical means of providing live for one human being by fundamentally taking the life of another.What I mean by this is that Annas parents were so caught up in trying to save Kates life that they were willing to design a baby for this reason. It is clearly unethical and shameful because it is an infringement upon the rights of Anna as a human being. It is very apparent that Anna could no monthlong live up to her parents and everyone elses expectations of being the organ provider for Kate whom they adorned so much to the point that everyone else became insignificant in their lives.Even Campbells lady friend gives her own opinion through this statement, even if the law says that no one is responsible for anyone else, percentage someone who needs it is the right thing to do. (Picoult, 122) At the conclusion, the guilt consumed the parents whereas the brother Jesse, Kate, Campbell and his girlfriend later on, his wife, begin to lead linguistic rule lives. Modern day society would say that the parents are deserving of the overwhelming sense of guilt because of what they made Anna endure as their own child. Another issue that Picoult covers is the levelheaded aspect where Anna medically emancipates herself.In the 1800s this was not a choice that could be made because it didnt exist during those times. This shows that people are able to make many more choices today than they could during the 1800s, many without being looked at as immoral unless it has been publicly exposed. bring factors of the resulting drama of both pieces of literature is the attempt to create unusual occurrences and climax. The writers want to give the readers an emotional and controversial feeling so that the themes may grab their attention allowing them to be captivated while reading.By doing this, it evokes a thought to keep reading and by finding the authors work captivating, they will want to read other literature written by the authors. I believe that both Ibsen and Picoult definitely come to their readers by their stylistic methods in which they use controversy to make their readers more i nterested. Bibliography Ibsen, Henrik. A Dolls House. London Penguin Books, 1965. Picoult, Jodi. My Sisters Keeper A Novel. raw(a) York Washington Square P, 2005.